The Outbound Report 2026

What real reply rates look like across email and LinkedIn in 2026. Built from anonymized campaign data sent with lemlist, not from surveys.

62.8M
Messages analyzed
Email and LinkedIn
172,057 sent every single day
111K
Campaigns
From 9,487 senders
304 launched every day
30+
Countries
Full metrics on each
From the US to Estonia
12mo
Period
Aug 2025 to Jul 2026
1,478,062 replies tracked
Part 01

The landscape

Baselines first. What outbound converts at in 2026, by channel, by region, by month.

TEST 01n = 62,800,800 messages

What does the average campaign convert at?

The baseline for everything below. Email carries 92.7% of the volume. LinkedIn carries a reply rate ten times higher.

Volume split by channeltotal messages sent
58.2M emails · 92.7%
4.6M
Email, the volume channelLinkedIn, 7.3%
Reply rate by channelreplies divided by sent
Email
1.40%
816K replies
LinkedIn
14.48% · 10x email
662K replies
The full baselineall campaigns, all geos
MetricEmailLinkedInCombined
Messages sent58,232,6754,568,12562,800,800
Open rate53.13%n/an/a
Replies816,473661,5891,478,062
Reply rate1.40%14.48%2.35%
Interested61,02647,114108,140
Interested rate0.10%1.03%0.17%
VerdictOne LinkedIn message gets as many replies as 10 emails. But LinkedIn is only 7% of total volume. That gap is the biggest opportunity in outbound right now.
TEST 02n = 111,043 campaigns

Email only, LinkedIn only, or both?

Three ways to run a campaign. LinkedIn only gets the highest reply rate. Mixing both does something better: it lifts email and LinkedIn at the same time.

Combined reply rate by campaign type
EmailLinkedInBoth
1.35%
Email only66,132 campaigns
77% of volume
15.72%
LinkedIn only24,259 campaigns
best reply rate
3.00%
Both channels20,652 campaigns
2.2x email only
TypeCampaignsUsersMessagesEmail openEmail replyEmail interestedLI replyLI interestedCombined reply
Email only66,1326,67648,515,20251.70%1.35%0.09%n/an/a1.35%
LinkedIn only24,2594,4443,097,778n/an/an/a14.55%0.98%15.72%
Both channels20,6523,81611,187,82060.27%1.28%0.14%14.32%1.13%3.00%
FINDINGCampaigns using both channels open at 60.3%, which is 8.6 points above email only. They also double the combined reply rate. Same email, warmer context.
TEST 03n = 9 geo and type combos

Does the region change the outcome?

A lot. Europe outside France leads on every combined metric. North America email only is the weakest cell in the whole dataset.

Combined reply rate by region and typecolor scaled inside each column
Email only
LinkedIn only
Both channels
Europe
1.70%
24,423 campaigns · 17.0M msgs
16.85%
11,436 campaigns · 1.5M msgs
3.79%
7,703 campaigns · 3.7M msgs
France
1.40%
20,755 campaigns · 14.7M msgs
14.23%
6,272 campaigns · 967K msgs
2.60%
8,487 campaigns · 4.9M msgs
North America
0.95%
20,954 campaigns · 16.8M msgs
15.42%
6,551 campaigns · 673K msgs
2.63%
4,462 campaigns · 2.7M msgs
Europe
n = 22.1M messages
TypeCampaignsUsersMessagesEmail openEmail replyLI replyCombined
Email only24,4232,77317,015,19260.26%1.70%n/a1.70%
LinkedIn only11,4362,0891,457,892n/an/a15.44%16.85%
Both channels7,7031,5843,669,38265.44%1.75%15.66%3.79%
France
n = 20.5M messages
TypeCampaignsUsersMessagesEmail openEmail replyLI replyCombined
Email only20,7552,16614,704,18456.44%1.40%n/a1.40%
LinkedIn only6,2721,275966,906n/an/a13.24%14.23%
Both channels8,4871,3564,862,93762.48%1.16%12.71%2.60%
North America
n = 20.1M messages
TypeCampaignsUsersMessagesEmail openEmail replyLI replyCombined
Email only20,9541,73716,795,82638.87%0.95%n/a0.95%
LinkedIn only6,5511,080672,980n/an/a14.51%15.42%
Both channels4,4628762,655,50149.28%0.89%15.13%2.63%
VerdictEurope with both channels converts at 3.79%. That is 4 times North America email only at 0.95%. Check what your region mix does to your numbers before you rewrite your copy.
TEST 04n = 30 countries

Which countries actually reply?

The volume goes to the US, France and Germany. The replies come from smaller European markets where inboxes are less crowded.

Top 10 by overall reply rateminimum volume applied, outliers flagged
Ukraine
15.36% · outlier, 76 senders
281K msgs
Denmark
6.72%
209K msgs
Hungary
6.63%
50K msgs
Lithuania
6.00%
76K msgs
Sweden
5.98%
187K msgs
Slovakia
5.39%
360K msgs
Estonia
4.73%
287K msgs
Netherlands
4.20%
1.8M msgs
Romania
4.04%
160K msgs
Spain
3.64%
535K msgs
Sort table by
#CountryCampaignsUsersMessagesEmailreplyEmailinterestedLinkedInreplyOverallreplyOverallinterested
01France35,5144,79720,534,0271.40%0.15%13.04%2.29%0.22%
02United States27,7133,23914,633,7521.22%0.06%15.04%1.98%0.12%
03Germany7,8741,2326,181,0691.33%0.10%15.05%2.24%0.18%
04Canada3,1463294,834,5270.26%0.02%15.62%0.63%0.05%
05United Kingdom10,9781,4944,634,1321.19%0.07%14.95%2.49%0.14%
06Belgium3,5675771,905,7021.68%0.13%14.40%3.03%0.26%
07Netherlands3,8147031,774,1842.64%0.19%17.40%4.20%0.28%
08Switzerland2,5004301,453,5062.08%0.16%15.66%3.20%0.29%
09Italy2,1183381,064,4491.67%0.15%14.37%2.79%0.18%
10Poland1,358197642,4491.22%0.10%15.21%2.01%0.19%
11Spain1,829316534,8571.81%0.12%16.92%3.64%0.18%
12Mexico93597510,5430.96%0.11%9.64%2.21%0.17%
13Austria881159474,6241.45%0.04%17.77%2.46%0.08%
14Portugal58171422,5891.62%0.14%17.78%3.42%0.34%
15Slovakia27432359,9005.17%0.02%20.50%5.39%0.02%
16Estonia79059287,0551.94%0.02%13.97%4.73%0.09%
17Ukraine2,43876280,94815.32%0.15%15.53%15.36%0.25%
18Greece17931271,0310.91%0.01%17.06%1.53%0.02%
19Slovenia37462244,3881.81%0.04%18.32%2.65%0.04%
20Czechia70480212,9102.14%0.26%13.61%2.87%0.31%
21Denmark48387208,5441.21%0.07%17.19%6.72%0.38%
22Sweden35583187,4374.41%0.11%16.96%5.98%0.12%
23Ireland43884177,9720.98%0.09%15.80%2.61%0.12%
24Finland36361177,1542.14%0.17%15.15%3.42%0.22%
25Romania32744160,1531.52%0.10%10.89%4.04%0.18%
26Panama195106,5330.98%0.00%20.00%(30)0.99%0.00%
27Bulgaria2293289,6590.87%0.03%12.18%1.94%0.04%
28Lithuania1243975,6942.91%0.04%32.72%6.00%0.10%
29Serbia3042671,0531.67%0.07%16.79%2.06%0.08%
30Hungary1542650,3632.54%0.18%24.84%6.63%0.15%
Note. Ukraine at 15.36% runs on only 76 senders with an unusual channel mix, so we flag it as an outlier. Canada at 0.63% is pulled down by bulk email senders. Values in grey come from under 1,000 sends and are directional only.
TEST 05n = 12 months

Is outbound getting harder?

Volume grew 21 times in a year. Reply rates did not collapse. They held between 2.2% and 2.4%, with one clear peak in January 2026 at 2.70%.

Overall reply rate and volume by month
Reply rateVolume
1.5%2.0%2.5%3.0%2.1525/082.2925/092.3325/102.4425/112.2625/122.7026/012.4026/022.4026/032.2526/042.2126/052.3226/062.3426/07
MonthCampaignsUsersMessagesEmail replyEmail interestedLI replyLI interestedOverall
2025-081,034515110,5291.41%0.08%23.25%0.81%2.15%
2025-098,4192,5792,381,8121.50%0.09%16.06%1.09%2.29%
2025-1015,2283,9644,613,8331.41%0.16%15.47%1.16%2.33%
2025-1119,6104,8004,588,2231.45%0.11%14.97%1.08%2.44%
2025-1221,1335,1154,451,6051.29%0.08%13.94%1.13%2.26%
2026-0126,6086,0485,116,6711.71%0.17%15.16%1.17%2.70%
2026-0232,1287,0276,181,9111.46%0.09%15.16%1.18%2.40%
2026-0338,9038,0697,420,2371.51%0.10%14.61%1.13%2.40%
2026-0442,1348,8447,270,7011.42%0.09%14.57%0.96%2.25%
2026-0543,3639,5096,723,0291.25%0.08%13.90%0.86%2.21%
2026-0649,13310,4617,160,2341.28%0.10%14.07%0.89%2.32%
2026-0751,83611,0416,782,0151.26%0.10%13.46%0.94%2.34%
VerdictJanuary is the best month. People reset their pipeline after the holidays and replies hit the yearly high of 2.70%. November and December are the low point at 2.26%. Plan your big pushes around that.
TEST 06n = 108 month, region and type points

Who drives the trend? Explore it.

Averages hide the movement. Filter by region and channel to see who pushed the January peak and who has been slowing down since.

Region
Channel
Email reply rateall regions · email only
2025-08
1.39%
98K msgs
2025-09
1.45%
1.9M msgs
2025-10
1.40%
3.5M msgs
2025-11
1.41%
3.5M msgs
2025-12
1.29%
3.4M msgs
2026-01
1.75%
3.9M msgs
2026-02
1.43%
4.8M msgs
2026-03
1.47%
5.8M msgs
2026-04
1.37%
5.7M msgs
2026-05
1.15%
5.2M msgs
2026-06
1.17%
5.5M msgs
2026-07
1.15%
5.2M msgs
Part 02

The copy

Email length and subject length. Two settings almost nobody tests, where the gaps are the widest.

TEST 07n = 15 length and region cells

How long should the email be?

There is no single answer. The best length flips by market. France rewards long emails. North America rewards mid length. The colored bar is the winner in each region.

Email reply rate by body lengthblue is the best bucket per region
Europe
winner: 101-150 words · 1.24%
0.87
0-50
0.98
51-100
1.24
101-150
0.96
151-200
1.19
200+
France
winner: 200+ words · 1.57%
0.72
0-50
0.84
51-100
0.72
101-150
0.74
151-200
1.57
200+
North America
winner: 101-150 words · 1.42%
0.46
0-50
0.26
51-100
1.42
101-150
0.73
151-200
0.47
200+
Europe
n = 24,453 campaigns
LengthCampaignsEmails sentOpenReplyInterestedBounceOverall
0-50 words6,2052,726,68149.36%0.87%0.05%3.17%1.94%
51-100 words5,0212,758,62651.49%0.98%0.05%2.65%1.02%
101-150 words5,9903,292,85852.18%1.24%0.06%2.92%1.26%
151-200 words3,7482,073,13755.78%0.96%0.04%3.20%0.98%
200+ words3,4891,917,17258.68%1.19%0.05%2.99%1.20%
France
n = 22,060 campaigns
LengthCampaignsEmails sentOpenReplyInterestedBounceOverall
0-50 words5,0191,756,19855.42%0.72%0.07%2.65%1.71%
51-100 words5,5063,482,93444.48%0.84%0.04%2.92%0.87%
101-150 words5,1212,835,27654.97%0.72%0.06%3.09%0.73%
151-200 words2,6501,335,58753.87%0.74%0.05%3.38%0.74%
200+ words3,7642,032,03949.97%1.57%0.35%2.62%1.57%
North America
n = 19,591 campaigns
LengthCampaignsEmails sentOpenReplyInterestedBounceOverall
0-50 words3,5161,493,10738.40%0.46%0.02%3.96%1.29%
51-100 words5,6884,922,20423.55%0.26%0.02%1.36%0.27%
101-150 words4,8563,733,93630.51%1.42%0.02%1.88%1.43%
151-200 words3,1761,404,64643.74%0.73%0.03%3.13%0.74%
200+ words2,3551,684,50157.79%0.47%0.05%3.14%0.49%
VerdictFrance with 200 or more words hits 1.57%, the best email reply rate in this report. North America between 51 and 100 words is the dead zone at 0.26%. Write for your reader, not for a rule of thumb.
TEST 08n = 12 subject and region cells

And the subject line?

Here the answer is the same everywhere. Between 31 and 50 characters wins in all three regions. Past 70 characters replies drop and bounces go up.

Email reply rate by subject lengthblue is the best bucket per region
Europe
winner: 31-50 chars · 1.24%
1.07
0-30
1.24
31-50
0.72
51-70
0.92
70+
France
winner: 31-50 chars · 1.17%
0.80
0-30
1.17
31-50
0.74
51-70
0.69
70+
North America
winner: 31-50 chars · 0.82%
0.50
0-30
0.82
31-50
0.67
51-70
0.38
70+
Europe
n = 24,453 campaigns
SubjectCampaignsEmails sentOpenReplyInterestedBounceOverall
0-30 chars10,2464,932,10653.39%1.07%0.06%2.98%1.69%
31-50 chars8,2894,624,67054.26%1.24%0.05%2.81%1.26%
51-70 chars4,1012,467,84950.21%0.72%0.03%3.07%0.74%
70+ chars1,817743,84951.65%0.92%0.06%3.58%0.93%
France
n = 22,060 campaigns
SubjectCampaignsEmails sentOpenReplyInterestedBounceOverall
0-30 chars9,3614,402,46152.65%0.80%0.09%2.65%1.23%
31-50 chars6,7034,001,83047.88%1.17%0.09%2.80%1.18%
51-70 chars4,1351,947,50551.85%0.74%0.23%3.53%0.75%
70+ chars1,8611,090,23852.47%0.69%0.05%3.39%0.70%
North America
n = 19,591 campaigns
SubjectCampaignsEmails sentOpenReplyInterestedBounceOverall
0-30 chars7,6533,593,75937.91%0.50%0.03%2.89%0.87%
31-50 chars8,0117,063,13929.56%0.82%0.01%1.34%0.83%
51-70 chars2,7161,739,60739.98%0.67%0.07%3.75%0.70%
70+ chars1,211841,88937.32%0.38%0.02%3.48%0.40%
TEST 09n = 20 combos, 22.5M emails

Cross the two. Where is the sweet spot?

Body length against subject length, every combination measured on email reply rate. Two cells stand out on the map.

Email reply rate by body and subject length
under 0.6%0.6 to 0.80.8 to 1.01.0 to 1.41.4% and up
0-30 chars31-50 chars51-70 chars70+ chars
0-50 words0.73%5.1M sent0.79%643K sent0.51%201K sent0.71%50K sent
51-100 words0.84%3.9M sent0.46%5.8M sent0.65%1.3M sent0.55%144K sent
101-150 words0.84%2.4M sent1.56%4.9M sent0.67%2.0M sent0.79%532K sent
151-200 words0.95%961K sent0.89%2.1M sent0.79%1.2M sent0.51%618K sent
200+ words1.18%565K sent1.54%2.3M sent0.79%1.4M sent0.68%1.3M sent
FINDINGTwo winners: 101 to 150 words with a 31 to 50 character subject at 1.56% on 4.9M emails, and 200 or more words with the same subject length at 1.54%. Short bodies with long subjects lose everywhere.
Part 03

The sequence

Where to start, how many steps to run, and which real sequences bring replies.

TEST 10n = 65,584 sequenced campaigns

Start with email or with LinkedIn?

The first touch sets the ceiling. Sequences that start on LinkedIn reply 2 to 3 times better overall than sequences that start on email, in every region.

Overall reply rate by first touch
Email firstLinkedIn first
Europe
LinkedIn first is 3.1x better
1.09%
Email first
3.36%
LinkedIn first
France
LinkedIn first is 2.0x better
0.96%
Email first
1.88%
LinkedIn first
North America
LinkedIn first is 3.2x better
0.72%
Email first
2.28%
LinkedIn first
RegionFirst touchCampaignsLeadsEmail openEmail replyLI replyOverall
EuropeEmail First18,58211,201,82652.58%1.08%12.61%1.09%
EuropeLinkedIn First4,4121,092,96159.43%0.95%12.23%3.36%
EuropeOther1,459768,15551.60%0.82%14.26%1.68%
FranceEmail First16,8809,893,72449.65%0.95%11.31%0.96%
FranceLinkedIn First4,0901,339,27561.10%0.70%9.80%1.88%
FranceOther1,090428,50550.10%0.57%11.82%1.54%
North AmericaEmail First16,50712,328,51833.31%0.71%9.91%0.72%
North AmericaLinkedIn First2,370686,29942.83%0.44%11.68%2.28%
North AmericaOther714360,98732.03%0.27%9.74%0.63%
VerdictOnly 17% of campaigns start on LinkedIn, and they reply 2 to 3 times better everywhere. If your leads are active on LinkedIn, start there.
Note. Senders who start on LinkedIn also tend to run smaller and better researched lists, so part of this gap comes from the sender and not only from the channel order. The direction is consistent across all three regions, which makes it a strong signal even so.
TEST 11n = 29M emails, 364K LinkedIn messages

How many steps is too many?

Email tires out fast. The sweet spot is 2 to 3 steps, then reply rates fall. LinkedIn does not tire the same way. Rates stay flat around 11% up to 5 touches.

Email reply rate by sequence lengthfalls off fast
1 step
1.01%
4.4M
2 steps
1.29%
4.4M
3 steps
1.24%
6.9M
4 steps
0.75%
5.4M
5 steps
0.44%
3.8M
6 steps
0.65%
2.1M
7 steps
0.86%
620K
8 steps
0.55%
697K
9 steps
0.73%
106K
10 steps
0.36%
205K
11 steps
0.16%
610
12 steps
0.69%
11K
15 steps
0.12%
4K
LinkedIn reply rate by sequence lengthstays flat
1 step
10.68%
133K
2 steps
10.69%
74K
3 steps
11.21%
68K
4 steps
11.21%
64K
5 steps
11.67%
13K
6 steps
8.02%
11K
7 steps
17.97%
2K
Note. Faded bars come from small samples, under 10,000 emails or under 5,000 LinkedIn messages, so read them as directional. The email spike at 5 steps comes from a few high volume senders. The overall shape is the signal.
TEST 12n = top 25 sequences per region

Which exact sequences win?

Real sequences ranked by how often they are used, with their real reply rates. E Email, L LinkedIn, C Call, M Manual, O Other.

Region
SequenceStepsCampaignsLeadsEmailsLI msgsEmail replyLI replyOverall
EEE33,9882,348,5032,348,50301.28%n/a1.28%
EEEE42,7512,094,9092,094,90900.75%n/a0.75%
EE23,4081,917,3781,917,05901.23%n/a1.23%
E13,1661,278,4611,277,97101.12%n/a1.12%
EEEEE5988707,023707,02301.63%n/a1.63%
EEEEEE6517514,731514,71000.94%n/a0.94%
EEEEEEEE8303409,033409,03300.69%n/a0.69%
EEEO4232236,779236,77900.83%n/a0.83%
EEEEEEE7138212,702212,70200.41%n/a0.41%
L1581137,087042,395n/a11.07%11.07%
EEEMO5108106,613106,61300.83%n/a0.83%
LL2441101,419039,453n/a10.46%10.46%
LLL331196,375036,928n/a12.08%12.08%
C19990,00900n/an/an/a
LLLL419553,588017,537n/a11.80%11.80%
EEEEEEEEE94250,47650,47600.90%n/a0.90%
EEEEEEEEEE109042,37042,37000.51%n/a0.51%
O14938,98200n/an/an/a
ELEE45938,67638,5301461.29%22.60%(146)1.37%
LE216832,74231,2591,4830.37%18.27%1.18%
LEE39731,64930,7149353.01%15.61%(935)3.38%
CC22030,21900n/an/an/a
EEELLL62529,73029,72371.25%14.29%(7)1.25%
M17329,42000n/an/an/a
EL27221,60019,8731,7271.03%18.01%2.39%
VerdictThe best mixed sequence in Europe is LinkedIn, then email, then email at 3.38% overall. Open on LinkedIn, then follow up by email.
Part 04

The levers

Personalization, list size, images, tracking. The settings most senders never question, measured.

TEST 13n = 42,925 campaigns

Does personalization pay? Depends how.

Four methods, from none at all to spin syntax. The surprise: variables only, where two thirds of senders sit, is the worst performing method.

Overall reply rate by personalization methodbadge shows share of campaigns using it
1.82%
No personalization10,799 campaigns
25% of usage
0.81%
Variables only28,887 campaigns
67% of usage
1.05%
Liquid conditionals847 campaigns
2% of usage
1.57%
Spin syntax2,392 campaigns
6% of usage
MethodCampaignsTotal sentEmail openEmail replyEmail interestedBounceLI replyOverall
No personalization10,7997,578,33845.82%1.03%0.02%3.29%11.48%1.82%
Variables only28,88727,035,40044.76%0.78%0.05%2.59%11.73%0.81%
Liquid conditionals8471,131,98158.36%1.03%0.07%2.68%16.11%1.05%
Spin syntax2,3922,354,53147.02%1.57%0.19%2.02%11.02%(998)1.57%
FINDINGSpin syntax reaches 1.57% reply, close to twice variables only at 0.81%. Writing 3 to 5 versions of each line is not more work per lead. It is more work once, up front.
TEST 14n = 12 method and region cells

Same method, same result everywhere?

No. Spin syntax in France is a big win at 2.43%. The same method in North America barely moves at 0.54%. The market decides what personalization buys you.

Email reply rate by method and regionblue is the best method per region
Europe
winner: Spin syntax · 1.09%
1.08
None
1.05
Variables
1.03
Liquid
1.09
Spin
France
winner: Spin syntax · 2.43%
0.55
None
0.80
Variables
1.05
Liquid
2.43
Spin
North America
winner: No personalization · 1.76%
1.76
None
0.52
Variables
0.97
Liquid
0.54
Spin
Europe
n = 15,902 campaigns
MethodCampaignsLeadsEmail openEmail replyInterestedLI replyOverall
No personalization4,7462,670,45549.29%1.08%0.03%12.50%2.19%
Variables only10,3349,235,77753.15%1.05%0.05%13.16%1.09%
Liquid conditionals486868,58559.80%1.03%0.06%15.92%(716)1.05%
Spin syntax336288,12558.24%1.09%0.17%11.39%(483)1.11%
France
n = 14,312 campaigns
MethodCampaignsLeadsEmail openEmail replyInterestedLI replyOverall
No personalization3,8393,082,06851.57%0.55%0.03%10.17%1.17%
Variables only8,5267,191,22350.01%0.80%0.11%10.34%0.82%
Liquid conditionals307194,70357.84%1.05%0.09%15.13%(641)1.10%
Spin syntax1,6401,193,51052.84%2.43%0.26%12.39%(226)2.43%
North America
n = 12,711 campaigns
MethodCampaignsLeadsEmail openEmail replyInterestedLI replyOverall
No personalization2,2141,825,81531.23%1.76%0.00%11.46%2.37%
Variables only10,02710,608,40033.90%0.52%0.02%10.73%0.55%
Liquid conditionals5468,69341.65%0.97%0.15%25.30%(83)1.00%
Spin syntax416872,89635.35%0.54%0.09%9.34%(289)0.54%
TEST 15n = 96,250 campaigns

Does list size kill reply rate?

Every step up in list size costs you replies, with no exception. From 1.74% at 10 to 50 leads down to 0.65% above 500.

Overall reply rate by campaign sizeone step down at a time
1.74%
10-5068,704 camp.
0.99%
51-10016,261 camp.
0.70%
101-1506,000 camp.
0.68%
151-2002,906 camp.
0.61%
201-5002,056 camp.
0.65%
500+323 camp.
Region
SizeCampaignsAvg leadsEmail replyLI replyOverall reply
10-50 leads68,70421
1.16%
12.55%
1.74%
51-100 leads16,26169
0.92%
10.03%
0.99%
101-150 leads6,000122
0.68%
7.69%
0.70%
151-200 leads2,906172
0.67%
8.98%
0.68%
201-500 leads2,056285
0.61%
5.80%
0.61%
500+ leads323719
0.65%
7.14%(14)
0.65%
VerdictSmall lists win everywhere, every time. A campaign of 10 to 50 leads replies 2.7 times better than one above 500. Segmenting is not optional.
TEST 16n = 37.4M emails

Should you put images in cold emails?

This is the most split result in the report. North America punishes images hard, with open rate falling from 43% to 15%. Europe is the only region where image campaigns get more replies.

Email reply rate with and without images
No imagesWith images, betterWith images, worse
Europe
+47% with images
0.97%
No images
1.44%
With images
France
-49% with images
0.98%
No images
0.51%
With images
North America
-89% with images
0.98%
No images
0.11%
With images
RegionImagesCampaignsEmails sentOpen rateReply rateBounceOverall
EuropeNo Images20,72210,635,17753.18%0.97%3.01%1.29%
EuropeWith Images3,7312,133,29752.06%1.44%2.79%1.45%
FranceNo Images18,6649,636,37051.09%0.98%2.76%1.19%
FranceWith Images3,3961,805,66449.45%0.51%3.79%0.51%
North AmericaNo Images14,7098,813,11243.22%0.98%2.75%1.13%
North AmericaWith Images4,8824,425,28214.71%0.11%1.14%0.11%
VerdictSelling to North America? Remove every image. The signal is clear. Selling to Europe? Images go with 47% more replies, but read the note below before you act on it.
Read this before quoting the Europe number. Replies go up by 47% but the interested rate is cut in half, from 0.052% to 0.030%, so some of those extra replies may be lower quality. Senders who use images in Europe also tend to be the ones using personalized images, who are often more experienced. So this is a correlation, not a proven cause. France at minus 49% and North America at minus 89% point the other way.
TEST 17n = 37.4M emails

Does turning off tracking boost replies?

On paper yes, senders without tracking reply at twice the rate. In practice this is about who they are: 20 times fewer, more experienced, and running smaller lists.

Email reply rate with tracking on and off
Tracking onTracking off
Europe
2.6x when off (cohort bias)
0.97%
Tracking on
2.49%
Tracking off
France
1.9x when off (cohort bias)
0.87%
Tracking on
1.68%
Tracking off
RegionTrackingCampaignsEmails sentReply rateInterested rate
EuropeTracking Disabled620670,6702.49%0.06%
EuropeTracking Enabled15,28212,097,8040.97%0.05%
FranceTracking Disabled801517,0821.68%1.12%
FranceTracking Enabled13,51110,924,9520.87%0.06%
North AmericaTracking Disabledsample not conclusive, left out
North AmericaTracking Enabled11,6609,408,6510.93%0.03%
Note. The tracking off samples are 15 to 20 times smaller and lean toward experienced senders with better lists. The pixel itself probably matters less than the profile of the sender who removes it. North America tracking off is left out because the sample is not conclusive.
© 2026 lemlistn = 62,800,800 · v1.0Aug 2025 to Jul 2026